Ahmednagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 22 Mr. K.D. Mote appearing for respondents no.01 and 02. He has proved the contents of the injury certificate. says that the said accident was caused ...

This is contrary to what has been stated in the FIR.

Therefore, this breach of condition of policy of insurance being "fundamental breach", the insurer of the offending vehicle, cannot be compelled to indemnify the Opponent No. 2. Therefore, "to pay and ...

1. This appeal is by the Insurance company challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chintamani, ['Tribunal', for short] in MVC No. 19/2007.

Citation: 2024:BHC-AS:20013,MANU/MH/2853/2024. 1. The issue involved in this appeal is pay and recovery order passed by the Tribunal and contributory negligence of the deceased.

It is significant to note that the complaint was lodged by the father of the claimant on 19.1.2007 whereas the claim petition was filed by the minor claimant represented through his mother, natural ...

15. The first contention, therefore, has no merit. 21. All contentions on merit, therefore, fail. Constitution to relieve him of the necessity to serve his prison term.

date of appearance of the parties, in accordance with law. vi. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

https://www.lawweb.in/2025/04/llm-notes-judicial-activism-in-india.html 4) LLM Notes: Judicial Process as an Instrument of Social Ordering in India https://www.lawweb ...

Thus, from a bare perusal of the order dated 09.05.2023, it is evident that the order imposing penalty dated 30.09.2008 and the rejection order dated 09.01.2013 were set aside on the ground of ...

Second witness of the claimant is Balasaheb Bongane CW-3. He states that he was proceeding on his motorcycle and witnessed the offending jeep dashed against motor cycle of the deceased Dattarao. He ...